I sat down with my brothers and we began playing. After we finished playing, we looked at all of our scores and all agreed that my score was the best. This was probably because I had more experience than the two of them, hence why I had the lead position from the start. And yet I did not win. Why?

The cleverness of this riddle lies in the double meanings of common words. When playing music, a "score" isn't a tally of points but rather the written notation that musicians follow. So, having the "best score" likely means that your interpretation or performance of the musical piece, as written in the sheet music, was exceptionally well-executed or accurate.

Similarly, a "lead position" in music doesn't imply being ahead of others in a competition. Instead, it could refer to playing a principal part in an ensemble, like a lead vocalist, a first chair violinist, or even a conductor who leads the entire group. This role requires skill and experience, which aligns with the idea of having more experience than the others.

However, even with a flawless performance of your part and a prominent role, you wouldn't "win" in the traditional sense because music, particularly when played with others, is typically a collaborative art form, not a contest. The goal is to create a harmonious and aesthetically pleasing sound together, where each musician contributes to the overall success of the performance. The reward comes from the shared experience of creating something beautiful, rather than from individual triumph over companions.